Saturday, September 20, 2014

Contra Libertoonianism: Liberty only exists inside the Group.

 

* Basic Libertarian Assertions * Government is just force. Force is ebil, and any good it does the market would do better, M'kay. ( note the pie in the sky assertions stated as if they are the most logical and historically sound things that could be stated ... but they are in fact based SOLELY on the IGNORANCE of the audience as the speaker is using RHETORIC not LOGIC to 'carry' his non-points ... Government is just a group of people acting as one; no person exists outside of or apart from these groups; rights and property are creations of these groups and DO NOT EXIST in nature, while the material needs of the members such as hunger, thirst and housing are very real and must be accommodated. thus where personal 'rights' conflict with the group the person loses in almost all real cases, since minus the minimum needs being meet 'rights' are meaningless  -- I will give the libertarians their 'freedom' and keep ALL the food, water and housing .... That should counter his absurd and silly 'definitions' which are really just dogmatic pronouncements about what ought to be rather than observations about what really is in being.) ...

And notice how it will all be just free and good .... But hold on what exactly are these libertarian 'defense companies' and these 'mutual contracts' that together give the 'community' the right to jail, fine, enslave, your person and take your items if you violate its norms? ( Sounds exactly like a state jailing one for breaking a law, NO?) What is the exact difference between the good old fashion states with their public functions and the libertarian 'alternative' with its purely for profit model except that the libertarian one is even more corrupted by lust for money?

And the 'community' to these dingbats equals exactly everyone who can pay for contract with these defense companies and the network of companies taken as a whole, as well as the network of 'people' that have contracts with each other to do business together; everyone else is outside the market/society/protection-of-law and presumably ipso facto outlaws or criminals.  Not even the NSDAP claimed quite this much power over its members much less society as a whole. You have to go to East Germany or the USSR to get to this level of physical control over the life of the citizen. These Feedumb advocates want to literally throw you from society, and keep you from using the road to walk away!!! And then 'charge' ie slave labor you for the 'right' of being fined by them! In effect they are promoting a super corrupt banana republic slash corrupt African tribal village, idolized as the highest form of human organization once all the utopian gibberish is striped and the results made clear. :nuts:

Notice: They even claim the right to keep you from using the roads, ANY water at all, ALL land since in their ideal world ALL of these things would be SOMEBODIES property you would have to rent or pay for otherwise else you would be a THIEF, for using WATER! Even the Romans gave their slaves free use of water!  No slave master EVER did half the crazy shit these dingbats talk about doing to those that won't obey their 'contracts' which function just like Civic Law.

They both have the power to kill, jail and collect monetary income out of these acts; but the libertarian one would have a PROFIT motive openly built in, and would assume that EVERYTHING that you use should cost ... since nature cannot be unowned ... and we in fact are 'Self Owners' ( gibberish nonsense that assumes we are property to be bought sold or used ... Atheist double talk for 'we are all potential slaves.' ) ...  Thus they gabber about freedom but it is in the end the freedom to be considered equal to lifeless matter.

So they talk about 'liberty' but woe unto you if you lack the means to PAY for that liberty and WOE unto everyone that lacks the means to pay more than those that might pay to have the system 'find' that they 'owe'!
They further assume that humans are naturally 'good' and nonviolent ... so of course private paramilitaries are NO problem and are better than public ones ... I mean what would or could go wrong with arming private companies and given them a profit incentive to take over Smurf-ville ... What could possible go wrong?  And thus they talk about 'morality' but would either be the worst sort of tyrants or the first people filling the trenches.






Saturday, September 13, 2014

Fundamentals of The PC Oligarchy

Fundamentals of The PC Oligarchy
We the modern Western Peoples live under a credit based oligarchy. It rules our society by means of controlling the volume and worth of both the issuance of credit and the commodities traded for that credit. All credit creation gains this oligarchy more power because ALL money created comes with an unpayable percentage of interest that does not exist. The basic formula is
A + X% =/= A; where only A exists in the world of empirical reality. If you think of society like a hamster on a wheel you are not far from the truth. This enormous power has allowed this oligarchy to in effect buy our social institutions in full.

Both parties are on their payroll. All major corporations are their partners or property.
Add caption
The media is a monopoly with the Oligarchies agenda as the ONLY allowed agenda. Education is designed to ensure stupid consumers NOT thoughtful citizens, because consumers are easily controlled by trinkets. IN sum our entire system social, economic, political and otherwise is rigged against you, the common man … and if you are 'majority' and male its doubly against you. This is the reason why it seems that YOU are not in control of your nation's destiny.
It is the reason why electing this or that party will not make any difference. It is the reason you are paying more and more and more for less and less and less while also making less and less and less, even before inflation is factored into the matter. It is the reason you are being empoverished slowly, and not so slowly. Why you are becoming like the Romans whom Tiberius Gracchus once noted were fighting for : the common air and light' for being 'houseless and homeless they wander about with their wives and children.'thir leaders lied when they said they were fighting for 'defend sepulchres and shrines from the enemy; for not a man of them has an hereditary altar, not one of all these many Romans an ancestral tomb, butthey fight and die to support others in wealth and luxury, and though they are styled masters of the world, they have not a single clod of earth that is their own.”

Sound Familar to anyone you may know? 

For more start here.   Then try this, and I find pictures do the best explaining, and that is that, Folks.  Also for information about a lot of random nonsense.